Cases of progress, Koh Tao
Calling witnesses in advance cases of Koh Tao. Filing from Friday 10 October Testimony was taken from two additional. The lawyer team would have to work hard to hear that a team of lawyers, lawyers, lawyers, sent to help. Witnesses in advance, may be seen as facilitating a witness, but it may be that it is a legal technique to remove trial easily discouraged, this is really bringing to justice and punishment, according to the justice system that is fair. Track. trial is disclosed to the public and the accused must be brought to court. 9: 00 pm, หว้ province, Koh Samui Shrine on a hillside philosophy. Video-beauty
Witness article 237 continue to prosecute before the courts building. When you believe that the witness will travel out of the Kingdom. There are no addresses or sources, as well as a resident person, away from the Court at the trial, or believe that it is a mess with the witness, whether directly or indirectly, or another reason, it is difficult to release the testimony traced the future Prosecutor by ourselves or by receiving a request from the victim or from an investigation will submit a claim by specifying several actions that the accused claimed to have done wrong to the Court so that the Court has instructed the witnesses to it as soon as possible. If knowledge and who is in control of the public prosecutor or investigating employees, the public prosecutor brought a particular court. If the control is contained in the Court’s jurisdiction, the Court picked the option considered when the Court received a request like that, it gives the Court the witnesses immediately. In this operation. The opposition also accused the lawyers or the khanopyan deposit in the case, according to the second paragraph. If this is the case, the accused alleged that the criminal offense if the Court will prosecute cases in which a lawyer must be set, or the defendant has the right to ask the Court to set a lawyer according to section 173 before beginning such witnesses, the Court asked the accused if there is a lawyer or not. In that case, the Court must give the lawyer, If the court sees that it is set up, lawyer, Attorney, area and proceed to the witnesses as soon as possible. But if the court sees that a lawyer cannot be set immediately or accused may not set up the lawyers. The witness asked the Court to replace some of those witnesses testify, the Court read, listening to testimony. If the accused in court by then, the Court read the aforementioned testify the presence of accused if the accused were subsequently sued the defendant in the criminal offense then such witness hearing, the trial of the accused in that case indicated that if he was to sue the defendant and persons who need to bring their testimony traced to travel out of the Kingdom. There are no addresses or sources, as well as a resident person, away from the Court at the trial, or believe that it is a mess with the witness, whether directly or indirectly, or another reason, it is difficult to release the testimony traced the future. The accused filed pleadings for courts by reason of a court order to allow witnesses who it immediately, when deemed appropriate, the Court, the Court ordered the witnesses allowed to notify the public prosecutor investigated and employees involved know. In the witnesses The public prosecutor has the right to the khanopyan Park and bring three of four paragraphs referred to in paragraph 1 and paragraph 5 comes into force, the provisions in section doyonulom 172 Tri comes into force doyonulom to witnesses who are children under the age of eighteen years may not exceed. unoffical translation CR.Pornpen Khongkachonkiet
You must be logged in to post a comment.