Five Burmese ethnic political parties which won 57 seats out of 1,160 seats in the Burma election called on Western nations to lift sanctions against the Burmese military regime which was followed by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) which praised the election on November 2010 as “conducive and transparent”. Those demands to the western nations proved that ASEAN has no moral value at all.
Let see what was happened before November election:
- Main political party NLD faced the pressure to fire its own leaders including General Secretary Aung San Suu Kyi.
- Political prisoners are still in the prisons before and after the election
- UN and foreign observers were not allowed to monitor the election
- Government party USDP only has all the privilege to access direct government funding, infrastructure, transportation, prosperities, full help from local authorities, free to go any where for the party organizational trips
- On the other hand, opposition political parties were facing intimidation and blockage to access to the people, they had to apply permission from the police station, local authorities to give a speech, blocked to get donation from foreign countries, some potential ethnic leaders were refused to register as political parties or as an individuals, prevented some potential ethnic parties for campaign trips.
- Forced to join USDP for government employees
- Threat of arrest if not vote for USDA
- The acting government Prime Minister was appointed as USDP Chairman before the election. As a result USDP party got all the privilege from the regime.
On the Election Day:
- Opposition parties members were not allowed to monitor the voting places
- But USDA party members were allowed to get into the voting places and ignored when they openly pressure the voters to vote for them
- After voting period end, opposition party members were not allowed to watch the counting of ballots. All the counting were not made public but counted by election commission appointed by the regime.
- Some candidates were announced as winners at voting day but they were informed the next day that USDP candidate was a winner.
- Many political parties agreed that the election was a sham and announced that they would not recognize the election result.
- In addition, recorded cheating system called pre-voting (advance voting) system designed to cheat openly by adding ballots as advance voting to favor USDA candidates who lost in the election day. Opposition party s candidates were not allowed in the counting process only election commission members counted the votes with no transparency. It is obvious that the election was rigged. Continue reading “What is the meaning of Asian Value?”
You must be logged in to post a comment.